1. Springer Proceedings (LNCS Series)
π For scientific and technical contributions in Assistive Technology, eAccessibility, and eInclusion.
- Published in Springer’s Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), indexed by: Web of Science (CPCI-S), Scopus, EI Compendex, ACM DL, DBLP, and more.
- Peer-reviewed (acceptance rate ~60%)
- π
Deadlines (To Be Confirmed):
- Extended Abstract (3β4 pages): Expected β February 2026
- Final Camera-Ready Paper (6β8 pages, LNCS format): Expected β April 2026
- π Submission must include:
- A short abstract (β€1500 characters, form-based)
- A blind, extended abstract in PDF/DOCX format (max. 10MB)
- π Strictly double-blind review by 3 experts.
- π Upload two
.zip
files (final paper files + administrative files). - π£οΈ Presentation: 20 minutes at the conference (upload in PPTX or accessible PDF).
- π Optional Springer Open Access available (fees apply).
2. Open Access Compendium (OAC)
π For interdisciplinary and practice-oriented work in accessibility, policy, education, health, etc.
- Published in the Open Access Compendium: βFuture Perspectives on Accessibility, AT & (e)Inclusionβ
ISBN: 978-3-903480-07-0 - Suitable for concept papers, models, reports, and policy or user-centered research.
- π
Deadlines (To Be Confirmed):
- Extended Abstract (3β4 pages): Expected β February 2026
- Final Paper (4β8 pages, OAC format): Expected β April 2026
- π Submission must include:
- A short abstract (β€1500 characters, form-based)
- A blind, extended abstract in PDF/DOCX format (max. 10MB)
- π Double-blind review by 3 experts.
- π Upload two
.zip
files:- Final DOCX + PDF + figures folder
- Contact info + signed copyright form
- π£οΈ Presentation: 20 minutes at the conference (upload in PPTX or accessible PDF).
π§Ύ General Requirements
- At least one registered author per paper is required.
- Additional paper fees apply for multiple submissions by the same author.
- All presentations must follow accessibility standards (e.g., W3C/WAI Presentation Guidelines)
π Review Criteria
All submissions will be evaluated based on:
- Relevance to ICCHP themes
- Scientific quality & innovation
- Originality and user involvement
- Clarity, organization, and contribution to the state of the art